Princeton University researchers have uncovered a previously unknown,
and possibly substantial, source of the greenhouse gas methane to
Earth's atmosphere.
After testing a sample of abandoned oil and natural gas wells in
northwestern Pennsylvania, the researchers found that many of the old
wells leaked substantial quantities of methane. Because there are so
many abandoned wells nationwide (a recent study from Stanford University
concluded there were roughly 3 million abandoned wells in the United
States) the researchers believe the overall contribution of leaking
wells could be significant.
The researchers said their findings identify a need to make
measurements across a wide variety of regions in Pennsylvania but also
in other states with a long history of oil and gas development such as
California and Texas.
"The research indicates that this is a source of methane that should
not be ignored," said Michael Celia, the Theodore Shelton Pitney
Professor of Environmental Studies and professor of civil and
environmental engineering at Princeton. "We need to determine how
significant it is on a wider basis."
Methane is the unprocessed form of natural gas. Scientists say that
after carbon dioxide, methane is the most important contributor to the
greenhouse effect, in which gases in the atmosphere trap heat that would
otherwise radiate from Earth. Pound for pound, methane has about 20
times the heat-trapping effect as carbon dioxide. Methane is produced
naturally, by processes including decomposition, and by human activity
such as landfills and oil and gas production.
While oil and gas companies work to minimize the amount of methane
emitted by their operations, almost no attention has been paid to wells
that were drilled decades ago. These wells, some of which date back to
the 19th century, are typically abandoned and not recorded on official
records.
Mary Kang, then a doctoral candidate at Princeton, originally began
looking into methane emissions from old wells after researching
techniques to store carbon dioxide by injecting it deep underground.
While examining ways that carbon dioxide could escape underground
storage, Kang wondered about the effect of old wells on methane
emissions.
"I was looking for data, but it didn't exist," said Kang, now a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford.
In a paper published Dec. 8 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
the researchers describe how they chose 19 wells in the adjacent McKean
and Potter counties in northwestern Pennsylvania. The wells chosen were
all abandoned, and records about the origin of the wells and their
conditions did not exist. Only one of the wells was on the state's list
of abandoned wells. Some of the wells, which can look like a pipe
emerging from the ground, are located in forests and others in people's
yards. Kang said the lack of documentation made it hard to tell when the
wells were originally drilled or whether any attempt had been made to
plug them.
"What surprised me was that every well we measured had some methane coming out," said Celia.
To conduct the research, the team placed enclosures called flux
chambers over the tops of the wells. They also placed flux chambers
nearby to measure the background emissions from the terrain and make
sure the methane was emitted from the wells and not the surrounding
area.
Although all the wells registered some level of methane, about 15
percent emitted the gas at a markedly higher level -- thousands of times
greater than the lower-level wells. Denise Mauzerall, a Princeton
professor and a member of the research team, said a critical task is to
discover the characteristics of these super-emitting wells.
Mauzerall said the relatively low number of high-emitting wells could
offer a workable solution: while trying to plug every abandoned well in
the country might be too costly to be realistic, dealing with the
smaller number of high emitters could be possible.
"The fact that most of the methane is coming out of a small number of
wells should make it easier to address if we can identify the
high-emitting wells," said Mauzerall, who has a joint appointment as a
professor of civil and environmental engineering and as a professor of
public and international affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School.
The researchers have used their results to extrapolate total methane
emissions from abandoned wells in Pennsylvania, although they stress
that the results are preliminary because of the relatively small sample.
But based on that data, they estimate that emissions from abandoned
wells represents as much as 10 percent of methane from human activities
in Pennsylvania -- about the same amount as caused by current oil and
gas production. Also, unlike working wells, which have productive
lifetimes of 10 to 15 years, abandoned wells can continue to leak
methane for decades.
"This may be a significant source," Mauzerall said. "There is no
single silver bullet but if it turns out that we can cap or capture the
methane coming off these really big emitters, that would make a
substantial difference."
No comments:
Post a Comment